Who are the Oath Keepers?
#BrutDocs: Fighting for the right to breathe
The Afghan women protesting against the Taliban
The "Havana syndrome" explained
Dr. Fauci slams Sen. Rand Paul for encouraging death threats
Djokovic's Australian Open controversy
Fun idea, but I doubt it.Hitler has the copyright on that, right?
Why is it Hell ( comma ) no. That's bothering me. He said hell no! He didn't pause or anything. Nobody is named NO. There's no reason for a comma there.
pretty liberal, but "hang them with the ropes they sell us" too
Why now though?
Violates freedom of speech?! Yet the happy birthday song is trademarked?! ... this has nothing with violating freedom of speech since racist can still use it...they just gotta pay for it :)
Ummm won't they just make a new symbol and use that? This doesn't solve anything. It's just a stupid childish game.
You don't want to supress, by making it private and to expensive to buy. Lol
Crystal cost 500 $ a bottle didnt stop poor getto black folk from buying it. Why would you think 25 $ dollar baby wipes would stop hilly billy nazis from buying items with there logo on it? 😂😂😂 fuckin FB always good for a laugh.
And read what's going wrong with trumps presidency. He just doesn't know how to run the government. Doesn't know any U.S. History, just a phony "patriot".
Well how much does it cost to trademark it
This is actually terrifying. If someone is capable of trademarking an international symbol, regardless of its meaning, whose to say thousands of companies wont be sued for using peace signs per say?
Its a great intent, but this power could be used for just as much evil.
i am baffled, if the money goes to people of color of ethnicities, towards education, towards indigenous communities, protect our water and mother earth, all for it
The Swastika was appeared across many different cultures, it is now a racist symbol, but I don't know how he would trade mark it, it is like trademarking the letter F.
Racism is a two way street dipshit...
Yeah thats not going to happen lol
Japanese Buddhists may have a problem with this, as the symbol belongs to them, before Hitler's stole it.
So this is just a really roundabout way of censoring people. People are as free to say things as you are to hate them for it. Going through a whole trademark process just for the sake of keeping people you don't agree with from expression is just pathetic. How about you use logic and reason to make it so no one wants to wear a swastika?
Trade mark the N-word? Lol
Black people will kill him too, as that word is also used to refer to another black guy as "my brother."
You cant trademark the nword and only prosecute racists. Youll have to prosecute black people too because trademark laws are a lot more strict requiring you to litigate or threaten litigation with a cease and desist on any offence in order to maintain the trademark
Stay informed and entertained, for free with myBrut.