Could The World Map Change? What The UN’s New Move Means For India

The UN backed wider use of equal-area maps. Here is why Africa looks bigger, India changes slightly and why New Delhi raised a J&K concern.
See also on Brut

The world map most people recognise is facing a fresh debate at the United Nations.

The familiar map can make some countries and continents appear larger or smaller than their actual land area. A new UN resolution has now brought that issue into focus.

So, could the way we see the world on a map change?

What Happened At The UN?

On 4 September 2026, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution called “Correct the Map: Rebalancing Global Cartographic Representation and Promoting Equitable Representation of the World's Regions, Particularly Africa.”

The resolution was introduced by Togo on behalf of African countries.

It passed with 164 countries voting in favour, the United States voting against and six countries abstaining. Serbia, Estonia, Georgia, Lithuania, Moldova and Ukraine were among those that abstained. 

The resolution calls for wider use and consideration of equal-area map projections, including the Equal Earth projection.

This distinction matters.

The UN has not banned the Mercator projection. Nor does the resolution legally force countries to use Equal Earth.

ALSO WATCH: The Purav Jha controversy: Who decides what a country’s official map looks like?

Why Does The Map Look So Different?

The familiar Mercator projection dates back to 1569 and was designed mainly for navigation.

It has one major advantage. It preserves directions in a way that makes it useful for sailors planning routes.

But it also creates a problem.

The farther a region is from the Equator, the more its size is visually exaggerated.

That is why Greenland can look almost comparable to Africa on a Mercator map, even though Africa is roughly 14 times larger than Greenland.

Europe, Russia and Canada are also visually enlarged, while Africa and parts of South America appear smaller than their actual land area. 

ALSO READ: Inside the 200-Year-Old India-Nepal Border Dispute That Still Remains Unsolved

Enter The Equal Earth Map

The Equal Earth projection was developed in 2018 with a different priority.

It is an equal-area projection, which means it aims to preserve the relative size of landmasses.

On this map, Africa looks significantly larger than it does on Mercator.

Europe and North America look smaller.

South America and parts of Asia also appear closer to their actual proportions.

India appears slightly larger too.

But there is no such thing as a completely distortion-free flat world map. Every projection has to make compromises between area, shape, distance and direction.

So this is not about finding a map that is perfect in every way.

It is about choosing a map that is more suitable when comparing the actual area of countries and continents.

ALSO WATCH: This pilot couple drew the largest Indian map in air

Did Every Country Agree?

No.

The vote was overwhelmingly in favour, but the United States voted against the resolution.

Six countries abstained.

Some concerns were not about the basic idea of showing land area more accurately, but about how political boundaries and disputed territories could be represented.

The resolution itself does not change sovereignty, borders or the legal status of any territory. Its focus is cartographic representation. 

That distinction is particularly important for India.

ALSO WATCH: Imran Khan & Pakistan’s New Map

What Did India Say?

India voted in favour of the resolution.

However, New Delhi made it clear that its vote should not be interpreted as an endorsement of one specific map projection.

India said it supported the broader use and consideration of equal-area projections, rather than backing Equal Earth as the only acceptable map.

But India also raised a separate concern about how its territory would be shown.

Following the vote, the Ministry of External Affairs said any UN-backed map must accurately depict India's sovereign territory, including Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, in accordance with India's official map. India said any representation that is inaccurate or misleading would not be acceptable. 

So India's position has two parts.

It supports efforts to represent the relative size of countries more accurately.

At the same time, it does not want the adoption of a new projection to result in a map that conflicts with India's stated territorial position.

ALSO WATCH: Nepal PM’s Speech On Lipu Lekh & Kalapani

Will The World Map Change?

Not immediately. The UN resolution does not redraw international borders or require countries to replace existing maps. Instead, it encourages wider use of equal-area projections that represent the relative size of countries and continents more accurately.

The Mercator projection will continue to be used, particularly for navigation. The resolution could, however, lead to greater use of equal-area maps in schools, public information and digital mapping.

TL;DR | News At a Glance

Why is the world map being reconsidered?
The commonly used Mercator projection distorts the relative size of landmasses, especially near the poles.

What did the UN do?
On 4 September 2026, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution encouraging wider use and consideration of equal-area map projections. It passed 164-1, with six abstentions. 

What is Equal Earth?
It is an equal-area projection that represents the relative size of continents more accurately than Mercator.

What will look different?
Africa will appear much larger, while Europe and North America will appear smaller. India will also appear slightly larger.

Did India support the resolution?
Yes. India voted in favour but clarified that it was supporting equal-area mapping broadly, not endorsing one specific projection. 

What did India say about Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh?
India said any UN-backed map must accurately represent its sovereign territory in accordance with India's official map. 

Will the resolution change India's borders?
No. It concerns cartographic representation and does not itself alter sovereignty, borders or territorial status.