back

CAA And Free India’s Tryst With Muslim Refugees

“Is the Citizenship Amendment Act anti-Muslim and pro-Hindu?” Lawyer and writer Abhinav Chandrachud presented a historical perspective to India’s new citizenship law. Thanks to Mumbai Collective: Celebrating Freedom and Pluralism for the footage.

26/02/2020 12:27 PM
  • 4.9M
  • 8.3K

5845 comments

  • Abheepsita P.
    4 days

    very interesting!

  • Vishal S.
    04/11/2020 17:11

    1 he and many others are critizing caa then why are the afread of nrc , nrc is not on the basis of religion 2 . If Making a law which includes some relegios difrences is unconstitutional then why we have , minority reservetion 3. Caa is not about rejecting your citizenship but about giving the citizenship on some relegios basis 4.how can we reject the citizenship who is not our citizen🙏

  • Karishma R.
    10/10/2020 08:46

    I am a fan

  • Bidisha C.
    26/09/2020 15:04

    <3

  • Rajeev Y.
    14/09/2020 10:10

    Indians are Indians same DNA. Who and why wants Hindu Muslim conflict. Who is gaining from this. 90 percent of Indians are OBC, SC, ST, minorities who are not Hindu and they have the same DNA as Muslim. So the native Indian Mulniwasi bhumiputra the 90 percent population is being manipulated by some people who have different DNA. Jews share the same DNA as Brahman.

  • Hemant S.
    09/09/2020 16:15

    Not that I agree or disagree with this guy.. But I find this far more constructive approach as compared to sitting on roads, shouting slogans and making life of common people hell by blocking roads etc. We live in a digital age. Crores of people have smartphones. Make videos, get yourself heard. Riots don't solve anything.

  • Rahul R.
    31/08/2020 20:27

    ... Ye dekh... Iski Jal rahi hai

  • Saketh S.
    27/08/2020 04:50

    nice english

  • Sharaf R.
    23/08/2020 14:28

    Good insights .. nice arguments

  • Navajith M.
    22/08/2020 15:59

    Bull crap in its purest form..!!

  • Adv G.
    21/08/2020 10:35

    Who has told the orphan to adapt Muslim religion stating his or her parents were muslims and should adapt muslim religion?

  • Adv G.
    21/08/2020 10:32

    Why dnt you say that Pakistan should allow all Hindus to settle down in Pakistan and buy property there?

  • Devidas K.
    16/08/2020 19:37

    Chutiya...

  • Surekha M.
    16/08/2020 03:07

    Baklol kahi ka

  • Santhosh K.
    14/08/2020 00:58

    dont include whole world dude.

  • Amit P.
    13/08/2020 16:12

    if you know something not too much about 1945 -1949 you never said CAA is unconstitutional Mr. Srinath .please go and read more then give a speech on it . debate of Nehru and patel debate of nehru and Ambedkar if you can't afford these documents contact me i will tell you where to search.

  • Nachiketa G.
    10/08/2020 16:04

    Shanaz biwi, was Pakistan created only for Jinnah and his keeps?

  • Nachiketa G.
    10/08/2020 16:03

    Mother fucker...tell me just one thing, Pakistan was created as Jinnah’s personal property? 25% of land mass was given to Pakistan and present Bangladesh and still Muslims should be allowed to stay back....was only aged Jinnah took Direct Action? What about peaceful community who burnt and killed innocent to pressure government for partition?

  • Krushna P.
    08/08/2020 14:05

    CAA is not unconstitutional, orator contradicting himself while explaining section 14. CAA is related to our neighbouring countries and not to the indian territory. If partition happened on the religious basis so the laws which are made for the people affected by the partition should be based on relegion.

  • Vipin V.
    08/08/2020 04:22

    Ok this was a result of anything that was done in pakistan can you elaborate and relate to the provision of then pakistan. If not plz dont make stories

Stay informed and entertained, for free with myBrut.

Stay informed and entertained, for free with myBrut.

switch-check
switch-x
By continuing, you agree to receive emails from Brut.