CAA And Free India’s Tryst With Muslim Refugees

“Is the Citizenship Amendment Act anti-Muslim and pro-Hindu?” Lawyer and writer Abhinav Chandrachud presented a historical perspective to India’s new citizenship law. Thanks to Mumbai Collective: Celebrating Freedom and Pluralism for the footage.

02/26/2020 12:27 PM
  • 3.4m
  • 5.7k


  • Fatima P.
    15 hours

    Muslims should be in the muslim nation! They are dominanation seeking group of people.

  • Balaji K.
    15 hours

    He just ripped and nailed into every so-called politician toying with idea of citizenship. The mere reduction from 11 years to 5 years is to make them eligible to vote in coming election and just stay in power and lead to chaos persecuting minorities, poor and unprivileged ones.

  • Suresh K.
    16 hours

    This guy is nuts🤣🤣🤣

  • Rajeevan K.
    16 hours

    What ever; the members of partition people never being an Indian ; Hindus never accepts them. How much lecture you gays conducted that in vein.

  • Sushma B.
    16 hours

    Srinath Raghavan thinks that India is Dharamshala .. why everyone wants to come and stay here ..why to think of Jews and others ..Hindu's sikhs and Buddhists are from india..

  • Shrikant S.
    18 hours

    In the past it was done for larger good and yoy want to tale disadvantage of it for ages to come.

  • Shrikant S.
    18 hours

    Dont tell us our mistake of past that we have formed very libral constitution.

  • Raja K.
    18 hours

    It's a very very mammoth topic. The keyword problem here is scads of multifarious situations and under the framework of Indian constitution, till the end there will be debates. If India can bring down it's population and increase the living standards of people then a permanent solution looks imminent.

  • Palaniandy C.
    19 hours

    You can justify but due to uncertainty the govt decided CAA. Sorry bro

  • Ashok K.
    21 hours

    Incomplete statement. What about East Pakistan, East Bengal & West Bengal. We are still suffering due to the same problems. Strongest Bengal truncated, now almost weakest. Partial deliberations.India truncated in the interest of Capital of Gujrati & Marwari with the help of Mr Sardar Patel.

  • Rashmi G.
    a day

    Hair splitting done as an intellectual..,👌😂 CAA is must..we should exclude all others except Hindus

  • Preetam M.
    a day

    Pakistan ka talwe chat

  • Parth S.
    a day

    Constitution and society is full of injustice

  • Mahmood J.
    a day

    Tea sellers criminal prime minister will not understand this argument

  • Karthikeyan M.
    a day

    Name it's makes it he to too anti sikhs anti Hindu

  • Shailesh P.
    a day

    Char panch ko apne ghar ke pichawade me Rakh le pata chal jayega jab puri basti ban jayegi bhosdike

  • Preetam D.
    a day

    Typical Useless piece of propaganda based on bias and picking only those incidents which matches the argument narrative.

  • Aaron B.
    a day

    That kind of what if stance makes possible any number of avenues and also deceptions for people who do not want to live under the Indian Constitution to enter. Remember history of Indian peoples and Muslims. Muslims do not, will not and cannot subject themselves to any government, even if secular, that is not the ordered religious government of Islam. Look at their teachings. Look at their behavior and actions. Look at their commandments that require death for following laws and government contrary to Islam. It is a very simple thing to understand. Muslims are commanded to kill, conquer, convert or enslave any nation or peoples that are not Muslim. This cannot be argued with. These facts are present in Islamic writings, speech and actions of the past and present. India, like every other non Muslim country, must guard itself against an openly combative and violently ideological religious government. Islam is the openly admitted enemy of freedom. Beware the Islam practice of Taqiyya.

  • Chandra S.
    a day

    Confused speaker. He does not distinguish between equal treatment before the law which applies to things like Criminal offenses, whether you are citizen or not and is based only on residence, same as the a Dhar card Vs the right of the Indian Parliament to decide who is eligible to become the citizen of India. The two are totally different and the CAA is absolutely Constitutional.

  • Subhasish C.
    a day

    See before 1947 there was one country called India. That Indian Muslims wanted a separate country for Muslims and finally got it as Pakistan. Not a single Indian Muslims gathered and protested. Remember more Muslims remain in India than Pakistan. Till date I have never heard any Indian Muslims criticised the division. Please do not give wrong Information.