back

CAA And Free India’s Tryst With Muslim Refugees

“Is the Citizenship Amendment Act anti-Muslim and pro-Hindu?” Lawyer and writer Abhinav Chandrachud presented a historical perspective to India’s new citizenship law. Thanks to Mumbai Collective: Celebrating Freedom and Pluralism for the footage.

26/02/2020 12:27 PM
  • 4.9M
  • 8.2K

3621 comments

  • Shravan K.
    12/06/2021 13:11

    India is not a dumpyard or Orphanage for illegal immigrants you dumbo

  • Sanjay R.
    29/05/2021 05:45

    भाई जब पूरे वर्ल्ड में हिंदू प्रताड़ित होता है तो वह कहां जाएगा इसके लिए तो केवल एक ही देश है हिंदुस्तान अगर मुस्लिम प्रताड़ित होता है तो उनके लिए 57 देश हैं वह कहीं भी जा सकते हैं वह अपने ही धर्म में प्रताड़ित होती है तो वहां का लॉ एंड ऑर्डर की समस्या है धार्मिक समस्या नहीं है

  • Shashikant P.
    19/05/2021 03:46

    Kaha se ate hai..log ....sab galt aalt bol raha hai..eeinsan

  • Krishna K.
    26/04/2021 13:21

    Seems to be an idiot with cooked stories. Why was and on whose behest pakistan was created? All the muslims across the country voted in favour of Muslim league which promised separate country for muslims. Then why at all any muslim allowed in the country? Or why at all Pakistan was allowed to be created? Don't feed falsehood.

  • Abhijeet R.
    20/04/2021 09:17

    Baat east Pakistan ki nehru pack bhi signed hua tha...or bengal mai hindu sikh ko wasa bhi right tha wo east se West aajaya ... M Baat ye thi jo Musliman pakistan ke liya hami bhara tha ...wo pakistan gaya tha ...to ....unka koi haak nahi tha wapas Anna ka....kyu ki wapas aana tha to Pakistan baanaya kyu ...or india secular state 1971 mai aaya ...tha na ki 1947 mai

  • Abhijeet R.
    20/04/2021 09:04

    bhai jab wapas India he aana tha to Pakistan baanaya kyu ... India secular 1971 mai baana ushe phala wo majority hindu state tha ... Phala aapna knowledge shai karo

  • Anjaneya S.
    20/04/2021 05:36

    Bla... Bla.. bla... There are exceptions. There could me many amendments. But under no circumstances one can mention Muslims as a minoriry in countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afganistan chich are hard core Islmic. No matter how much anyone try to trick in words this is the fact. Talking about 1947-48 is really illogical coz the conditions at that time were very different. Pak and Ban were formed or rather snatched by Muslims under the name of religion so it was only care to allow only Non Muslims to come across here at that time. Constitution is not god given, it needs to be changed as per the situations. Constituion is for people not vice versa. Secularism is quite misused and misinterpreted term in our nation. Common sense, humanity, ethics and honesty are above all. Secularism is important but it has to be practiced in sencible way.

  • Vijay K.
    15/02/2021 01:20

    Preach brother 🙌🙏🏽

  • Sharmistha P.
    18/01/2021 02:24

    When he says RSS is a communal organisation, he lost the whole speech there, no need to watch further

  • Atish D.
    06/12/2020 07:48

    He dare not speak a word goes against that one particular religion because he knows better. I would call this ass just another illogical, hypocrite coward.

  • Atish D.
    06/12/2020 07:42

    Enough of this guy's lecture on constitution and citizenship and all those dumbtards applause on his statements, question remains can we really afford let anyone come in ??? Why even divide/separate a nation on the name of particular religion but since this actually happened then why not all leave to their newly given/created nations ? And why allow all those who left to come back for whatever reason ? Whatever land given is given, it's not coming back but who ever was supposed to go was given right to leave or stay and whoever left has right to come back as they please ? Wow Again I ask same question, can we really afford that ? Answer is NO WE CAN NOT. Better change constitution for not just better but "safer" tomorrow.

  • Abheepsita P.
    30/11/2020 10:20

    very interesting!

  • Vishal S.
    04/11/2020 17:11

    1 he and many others are critizing caa then why are the afread of nrc , nrc is not on the basis of religion 2 . If Making a law which includes some relegios difrences is unconstitutional then why we have , minority reservetion 3. Caa is not about rejecting your citizenship but about giving the citizenship on some relegios basis 4.how can we reject the citizenship who is not our citizen🙏

  • Karishma R.
    10/10/2020 08:46

    I am a fan

  • Rajeev Y.
    14/09/2020 10:10

    Indians are Indians same DNA. Who and why wants Hindu Muslim conflict. Who is gaining from this. 90 percent of Indians are OBC, SC, ST, minorities who are not Hindu and they have the same DNA as Muslim. So the native Indian Mulniwasi bhumiputra the 90 percent population is being manipulated by some people who have different DNA. Jews share the same DNA as Brahman.

  • Hemant S.
    09/09/2020 16:15

    Not that I agree or disagree with this guy.. But I find this far more constructive approach as compared to sitting on roads, shouting slogans and making life of common people hell by blocking roads etc. We live in a digital age. Crores of people have smartphones. Make videos, get yourself heard. Riots don't solve anything.

  • Rahul R.
    31/08/2020 20:27

    ... Ye dekh... Iski Jal rahi hai

  • Saketh S.
    27/08/2020 04:50

    nice english

  • Sharaf R.
    23/08/2020 14:28

    Good insights .. nice arguments

  • Navajith M.
    22/08/2020 15:59

    Bull crap in its purest form..!!