back

CAA And Free India’s Tryst With Muslim Refugees

“Is the Citizenship Amendment Act anti-Muslim and pro-Hindu?” Lawyer and writer Abhinav Chandrachud presented a historical perspective to India’s new citizenship law. Thanks to Mumbai Collective: Celebrating Freedom and Pluralism for the footage.

02/26/2020 12:27 PM
  • 4.4m
  • 7.6k

5372 comments

  • Rajeev Y.
    09/14/2020 10:10

    Indians are Indians same DNA. Who and why wants Hindu Muslim conflict. Who is gaining from this. 90 percent of Indians are OBC, SC, ST, minorities who are not Hindu and they have the same DNA as Muslim. So the native Indian Mulniwasi bhumiputra the 90 percent population is being manipulated by some people who have different DNA. Jews share the same DNA as Brahman.

  • Hemant S.
    09/09/2020 16:15

    Not that I agree or disagree with this guy.. But I find this far more constructive approach as compared to sitting on roads, shouting slogans and making life of common people hell by blocking roads etc. We live in a digital age. Crores of people have smartphones. Make videos, get yourself heard. Riots don't solve anything.

  • Rahul R.
    08/31/2020 20:27

    ... Ye dekh... Iski Jal rahi hai

  • Sharaf R.
    08/23/2020 14:28

    Good insights .. nice arguments

  • Navajith M.
    08/22/2020 15:59

    Bull crap in its purest form..!!

  • Devidas K.
    08/16/2020 19:37

    Chutiya...

  • Surekha M.
    08/16/2020 03:07

    Baklol kahi ka

  • Santhosh K.
    08/14/2020 00:58

    dont include whole world dude.

  • Amit P.
    08/13/2020 16:12

    if you know something not too much about 1945 -1949 you never said CAA is unconstitutional Mr. Srinath .please go and read more then give a speech on it . debate of Nehru and patel debate of nehru and Ambedkar if you can't afford these documents contact me i will tell you where to search.

  • Nachiketa G.
    08/10/2020 16:04

    Shanaz biwi, was Pakistan created only for Jinnah and his keeps?

  • Nachiketa G.
    08/10/2020 16:03

    Mother fucker...tell me just one thing, Pakistan was created as Jinnah’s personal property? 25% of land mass was given to Pakistan and present Bangladesh and still Muslims should be allowed to stay back....was only aged Jinnah took Direct Action? What about peaceful community who burnt and killed innocent to pressure government for partition?

  • Krushna P.
    08/08/2020 14:05

    CAA is not unconstitutional, orator contradicting himself while explaining section 14. CAA is related to our neighbouring countries and not to the indian territory. If partition happened on the religious basis so the laws which are made for the people affected by the partition should be based on relegion.

  • Vipin V.
    08/08/2020 04:22

    Ok this was a result of anything that was done in pakistan can you elaborate and relate to the provision of then pakistan. If not plz dont make stories

  • Vipin V.
    08/08/2020 04:20

    How clever the muslims were that within 1 year they know that they have come to a wròng place how good u r at story telling

  • Ankit T.
    08/07/2020 17:12

    Sau baat ki ek baat you are a big matherchod. That's it

  • Vijayendra P.
    08/06/2020 15:08

    1-why were muslims coming back from terrroristan after making partition successful and killing lakhs of non-sunnis for their baseless dream of muslim land,sharia by preplanned organising DIRECT ACTION DAY. 2-BHARAT was made secular and socialist by 42th amendment of preamble during emergency which itself is unconstitutional. 3-Muslim got islamic nation(terroristan) they even got bangladesh (which is muslim majority but democratic till now,i don't know how)Many of them even remained in india. But what about hindus who wanted separate pand for them?? were they demanding something which was totally new, different or which never happened on this earth?? Many country have defined state religion, what's wrong in it as you said about UK. And why hindu were not allowed to form hindu rashtra because we never believed in DIRECT ACTION DAY & killing innocents?? 4-Indian government haven't done some "EHSAAN" by giving automatic citizenship to hindus and sikhs who came to india after partition. Leaders like gandhi and nehru were responsible for partition as they accepted illegitimate demand of radical muslims including jinnah. they were responsible for murder for lakhs of hindua and shikhs,rape and kidnapping of lakhs of hindus and sikhs and for lakhs of them who became homeless,jobless and whose life became worthless.their carrier,dreams all were finished. 5-We must also give citizenship to jews,shias,ahmedias,hazars,aethists,agonists too but particular problem have particular solution. because you may ask too that why caa don't include all nations of world. why we didn't given citizenship to any expoited group from Antarctica (though there are none). 6-ostensibly humanatarian🤣 even HoD of english in oxford university will wait for 2 minutes forbthis hypocrisy. don't forget pakistan was made because as muslims said that they can't live with majority hindus.so they wanted separate nation. 7-parsis from iran will have to wait for 11 years but only for 5 years if he is from afganistan. yes you are right but it doesn't make you sense because you are a senseless guy hungry of applauses, because a hindu from pak,afgan,bang will have to wait for 5 years but what about hindus and other included in caa from other countries where they are prosecuted?? do you don't found this senseless too?? 8-bangladeshis who came illegaly to maharashtra and have child here.yes it's not his fault,shall we jail him??,No,make him PM of india and open the door for all humans on earth to come to india which is unlike to do for any country. ये कोई ran*ikhana है?? 9-you are opposing CAA but at same time "isko lelo,usko lelo,isko kyun include nhi kiya,usko kyun nhi kiya" are bhai kehna kya chahte ho?? you have only questions/problems but no solutions. that's the biggest hypocrisy. having a luxury car, regularly visiting dominos,kfc,multiplex and opposing capitilism is not a big thing. have some on ground experience to understand what happened to those(who also foughted for india's independence) who were made 2nd cass citizen in their own country(british india) due to foolish demand of people from one religion. and they are not even ashamed today for what happened on direct action day,after partition and even today in pak,afgan, bangladesh even today. demolished thousands of hindu,jain, buddhist temples,gurudwars,shia,ahmedia etc's mosques. listen your heart once and have some shame.

  • Jagan R.
    08/05/2020 12:36

    Senior dhruv rattee aakand gyani

  • Kaustubha G.
    08/04/2020 11:57

    All that is being portrayed is based on half baked theories, half assimilated knowledge, semi literacy and largely funded propagandist theories of pseudosecularistic parties. Good that everyone has understood what these disgusting elitist minds are ought to try to bring out. They are certainly going to be weeded out soon.

  • Sudesh S.
    08/04/2020 10:39

    Kon hai yeh haraaamkhor anpad sibal ka chappal?

  • Nikhil Y.
    08/04/2020 10:07

    If only this moron could explain why these communities are facing religious persecution. It's very easy to say anything from the comfort of safety of home. Look at the pathetic condition of people suffering due to these lunatics across world.

Stay informed and entertained, for free with myBrut.

Stay informed and entertained, for free with myBrut.

switch-check
switch-x
By continuing, you agree to receive emails from Brut.