Priyanka Chaturvedi Objects To Amendments In Abortion Bill

For those who have faced such consequences after terminating a pregnancy should come ahead ....for d sake of women n motherhood.

Well said. I think the decision should always be hers and hers only.

There should be. A open minded women head also incharge of this because why are men making decisions about abortion I don’t get it?

It is so pathetic that I don't understand that if she is raped why she is not respected and she should have a choice in whatever she wants to do 🙏

Thanks for standing up for a woman

Absolutely agreeable

Madan,ladie's real physical partner to whom efforts feutal formed,through their effort take care of their children,not right to equality by birth but by following fundamental duties and religious rules uniform whole country,because people republic of India never be untouched with it's policies. Ladie's are more successful than gents,why then abortion,first and basic need of India is civilised India not poverty eradication,education,malneutrion and ignorant but intelligent bastards. Population growth is boon in our country due to ill and bastard politicians and officers and uncivilised people of country.

Perfect presentation as a lady MP for women's/mother's Womb termination bill before chair.Thanks

Now this is a shame towards the government. We really don't have any specific and strong laws for rape victims. If some of the horrific incidents have taken place in her and if she's not ready to keep the child it's genuinely her consent because when such kind of brutality happens neither the society nor the people out their help them. So here a big question arises because majority of the women's in India are not financially free. So ultimately to raise the child and foetus in her womb the living life is biggest responsibility. Because society never agrees with these terms easily. It's her body but still you need for the validation from other people whether to keep the child or not. So unless and until the victims are not be given a proper care for their financial independency not a single women or girl can take the sole responsibility of raising a kid. So yes the bill should be amended.

Impactful representation

No I am not saying anything against/for her. I am praisimg the way she represent herslf in the parliament. Kudos lady. Look at the confidence. I am prasing her tone and her way of saying. Clear cut, to the point. That is how, a representative should talk. That is all

She literally said a life inside the mother . So you are happy and advocating for killing the babies

It's a sensitive topic and I am really thankful that a parliamentarian like her talking about this topic so sensibly..I totally agree with this woman in this topic..No law should interfere in someone's choices..its unconstitutional and against human rights...no law can't fix what we should do or not especially in this sensitive matter..As because sometime situation must be the big thing which we can't control but by taking the right decision we can we can fix or save our future..

I strongly object Abortion unless the unborn child has severe birth defects. A child born can be given to parents to who are eagerly waiting for the blessing of a child. In fact, no women must undergo abortion unless health issues exist. I am a mother and whether consensually or forcefully, its never the fault of the unborn child to be terminated. Its a brutal process. Every mother is God's Angel. We must look upto the pregnant women and elevate her position in society rather than taking of abortion.

She is right

It's only feminazis who would justify killing of a foetus nearly to promote their ideology they don't care about the pain of the foetus and the pain which the father goes after losing his child only a feminazi e would be insensitive enough to the pain of the foetus itself shame on feminism

Shame on you brute you totally ignore the pain of the foetus and also totally ignore the fact that many contraceptives are available to prevent pregnancy and many e pills are available to terminate pregnancies in first and second week why do you want the woman to become insensitive or give chance to a selfish and cruel woman to kill the foetus which is there in her w o m b just to take revenge from husband and his family and also so why would a woman keep pregnancy XX for 24th week he would only do so when she actually wanted the pregnancy but when she found no other way to take revenge from the man to whom the foetus belongs to Tu She Goes and about and give some painful death to the foetus shame on you brute you are justifying killing of foetus by women which is very very very very very very very very very very very very very very painful

For all the feminine this year was supporting abortion first of all let me clear that abortion is very very very very very very very very painful for the foetus itself and I am sure feminazis will never care about the pain of the foetus when it comes to their interest and favouring women and creating environment where even India and Indians behave like American or Western people who are immune to the very pain of the foetus occur secondly now let me tell you the parliamentary and who talked about the abortion it is completely wrong just for women do not go for abortion just too because of her conditions but maybe e many times she goes to take revenge on husband and her family by killing the foetus and obviously there is no punishment for that many women in order to take revenge from husband and his family book husband and his family under various acts which are meant to for the protection of women does if a woman is given another tool to kill a small child inside how home this will remove the fear from the woman's heart and make them more insensitive since there is no fear of killing even a small child why do we need abortions first of all if a tall woman is raped then why should invent for photo mention of pregnancy at the beginning when she never got her periods at the first place why she didn't go to the doctor in the first week itself and asked for the termination of pregnancy why she had to wait till 20 th week till child is developed ... This clearly indicates THAT WOMEN IS GOING THROUGH ABORTION TONTAKE REENGE ON HER HUSBAND BY KILLING AN UNBIRN CHILD.... ALL OPTIONS TO TERMINATE PREGNANCY ARE AVAILABLE IN FIRST WEEK AND ALSO CONTRACEPTIVES WHY SHE DOESN'T USE THEM? PREGNACY IS REPONSIBILTY OF WOMEN AND SHE ALSO HAS RIGHT TO TERMINATE BUT BEYOND 20 WEEKS ITS DANGEROUS FOR WOMEN AND ALSO HUGE TORTURE FOR FETUS..... SHAME ON FEMINISM

Photo comments on kar Admin

Should a woman have to go such bureaucratic process to terminate a pregnancy? Yes. Very much a yes. Because a child is involved. Also advice to people reading this - keep using the word “child”. These people would like to use euphemisms like “pregnancy” and “fetus” in order to dehumanize the act so it is more palatable and sounds more righteous.