Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has reportedly apologised to the Indian government following a series of meetings between senior Meta executives and officials from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY).
The apology comes days after Facebook briefly removed a video posted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, triggering criticism from the Centre and leading to heightened scrutiny of Meta's content moderation practices in India.
According to government sources, the discussions also covered concerns around child sexual abuse material (CSAM), deepfake content, algorithmic bias and the way Meta's platforms recommend and promote content.
Why Was Meta Summoned By The Government?
On August 5, Meta's Chief Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan and his team met MeitY Secretary S Krishnan before holding discussions with IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw.
The meetings followed the government's decision to summon Meta after Facebook temporarily removed a video shared by Prime Minister Narendra Modi about action against examination paper leaks during ongoing student protests.
Meta restored the post shortly afterwards and said the removal was caused by a technical error in its automated systems. However, the government described the explanation as inadequate and sought further clarification.
What Did Zuckerberg Apologise For?
According to government sources, Zuckerberg apologised over multiple issues raised during the discussions, including:
The temporary removal of PM Modi's Facebook post
The presence of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) on Meta platforms
The spread of deepfake content
Operational errors in Meta's content moderation systems
Alleged algorithmic bias in content recommendations
Government sources also claimed that Meta acknowledged that "a lot of money was paid for boosting certain types of content" and expressed regret over the issue.
Meta has not publicly confirmed these specific claims.
Why Is CSAM Being Discussed?
One of the government's major concerns was the alleged availability of child sexual abuse material on Instagram.
The issue gained attention after a BBC investigation reported that Instagram displayed paid advertisements containing phrases such as "rape video" and "child video". According to the report, these advertisements redirected users to Telegram channels allegedly selling child sexual abuse material for as little as ₹99.
Following the report, MeitY sought an explanation from Meta regarding the platform's moderation systems and safeguards.
What Was The PM Modi Facebook Post Controversy?
The controversy began after Facebook briefly removed a video posted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on July 23.
The video focused on the government's crackdown on examination paper leaks during student protests and was described as Modi's first selfie-style video aimed at younger audiences.
Meta later restored the post, stating that its AI-powered automated content filters had mistakenly removed the original upload while reviewing related content circulating on the platform.
The company apologised for the error, but the government maintained that such mistakes should not occur on a platform of Meta's scale.
What Did The Parliamentary Committee Say?
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications and Information Technology, chaired by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, also took note of the incident.
According to reports, the committee summoned Meta officials and sought an apology from Zuckerberg within three days. It reportedly warned that Meta's safe harbour protections under India's Information Technology Act could face scrutiny if the company is found to be exercising editorial control over content rather than acting solely as an intermediary.
Government sources have argued that if platforms selectively determine the reach of content through algorithms, their intermediary status could be questioned.
Has Meta Responded?
Meta has publicly stated that the removal of PM Modi's post resulted from a technical glitch involving its automated content moderation systems and apologised for the error.
The company also informed the government that it would strengthen oversight for posts made by prominent public figures to reduce the likelihood of similar incidents in the future.
However, Meta has not publicly confirmed the government sources' claims regarding Zuckerberg's reported apology over CSAM, deepfakes, algorithmic bias or paid content boosting.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has reportedly apologised to the Indian government following a series of meetings between senior Meta executives and officials from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY).
The apology comes days after Facebook briefly removed a video posted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, triggering criticism from the Centre and leading to heightened scrutiny of Meta's content moderation practices in India.
According to government sources, the discussions also covered concerns around child sexual abuse material (CSAM), deepfake content, algorithmic bias and the way Meta's platforms recommend and promote content.
Why Was Meta Summoned By The Government?
On August 5, Meta's Chief Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan and his team met MeitY Secretary S Krishnan before holding discussions with IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw.
The meetings followed the government's decision to summon Meta after Facebook temporarily removed a video shared by Prime Minister Narendra Modi about action against examination paper leaks during ongoing student protests.
Meta restored the post shortly afterwards and said the removal was caused by a technical error in its automated systems. However, the government described the explanation as inadequate and sought further clarification.
What Did Zuckerberg Apologise For?
According to government sources, Zuckerberg apologised over multiple issues raised during the discussions, including:
The temporary removal of PM Modi's Facebook post
The presence of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) on Meta platforms
The spread of deepfake content
Operational errors in Meta's content moderation systems
Alleged algorithmic bias in content recommendations
Government sources also claimed that Meta acknowledged that "a lot of money was paid for boosting certain types of content" and expressed regret over the issue.
Meta has not publicly confirmed these specific claims.
Why Is CSAM Being Discussed?
One of the government's major concerns was the alleged availability of child sexual abuse material on Instagram.
The issue gained attention after a BBC investigation reported that Instagram displayed paid advertisements containing phrases such as "rape video" and "child video". According to the report, these advertisements redirected users to Telegram channels allegedly selling child sexual abuse material for as little as ₹99.
Following the report, MeitY sought an explanation from Meta regarding the platform's moderation systems and safeguards.
What Was The PM Modi Facebook Post Controversy?
The controversy began after Facebook briefly removed a video posted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on July 23.
The video focused on the government's crackdown on examination paper leaks during student protests and was described as Modi's first selfie-style video aimed at younger audiences.
Meta later restored the post, stating that its AI-powered automated content filters had mistakenly removed the original upload while reviewing related content circulating on the platform.
The company apologised for the error, but the government maintained that such mistakes should not occur on a platform of Meta's scale.
What Did The Parliamentary Committee Say?
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications and Information Technology, chaired by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, also took note of the incident.
According to reports, the committee summoned Meta officials and sought an apology from Zuckerberg within three days. It reportedly warned that Meta's safe harbour protections under India's Information Technology Act could face scrutiny if the company is found to be exercising editorial control over content rather than acting solely as an intermediary.
Government sources have argued that if platforms selectively determine the reach of content through algorithms, their intermediary status could be questioned.
Has Meta Responded?
Meta has publicly stated that the removal of PM Modi's post resulted from a technical glitch involving its automated content moderation systems and apologised for the error.
The company also informed the government that it would strengthen oversight for posts made by prominent public figures to reduce the likelihood of similar incidents in the future.
However, Meta has not publicly confirmed the government sources' claims regarding Zuckerberg's reported apology over CSAM, deepfakes, algorithmic bias or paid content boosting.
To learn more
No items found.