The viral story of three women from Uttar Pradesh allegedly marrying the same man has taken a dramatic turn.
Days after publicly claiming they had voluntarily married one man so they could continue living together, the three women have now told the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) that no marriage ever took place.
According to their latest statement, the viral wedding videos were staged to gain popularity on Instagram and increase their social media following.
The development reverses the narrative that had sparked nationwide debate over the legality of a marriage involving one man and three women.
What Have The Women Said Now?
According to Hindi media reports, the three women appeared before the Child Welfare Committee after the videos attracted widespread attention online.
During their interaction with the committee, they reportedly said:
They did not marry the cameraman featured in the videos.
The wedding ceremony was scripted and staged.
The videos were created to gain Instagram followers and social media popularity.
The public mistook the content for a real wedding.
If accepted, their latest statement directly contradicts the claims they had made in earlier videos, where they insisted the marriage was genuine.
What Did They Claim Earlier?
When the videos first went viral, the women had publicly maintained that:
they had willingly married the same man,
they wanted to continue living together instead of marrying into separate families,
all four individuals were adults and had acted with mutual consent,
the ceremony was genuine and not created solely for social media attention.
The man featured in the videos, 20-year-old Vikas, also known as Vikky, had echoed those claims, saying the wedding was real and that he supported the women's decision.
Their statements prompted widespread discussion on social media, with many questioning whether such a marriage was legally valid under Indian law.
ALSO READ: Three Women Married The Same Man In Uttar Pradesh. Here's Why They Said They Did It
Why Did The Story Go Viral?
Videos circulating online appeared to show one man performing Hindu wedding rituals with three women, including taking the seven pheras and applying sindoor.
The visuals quickly went viral, with many believing they depicted an actual wedding ceremony.
The story generated intense discussion around personal choice, social acceptance and the legal framework governing marriage in India.
ALSO READ: Bengaluru Triple Murder Case: How Kenneth Arun Kumar Allegedly Used AI To Plan The Crime
What Had Police Said Earlier?
Following the circulation of the videos, police spoke to the four individuals and their families.
According to reports at the time, they told police they were adults and had participated in the ceremony voluntarily. Officials had also said no formal complaint had been received, and any legal action would depend on whether a cognisable offence was found or a complaint was filed.
What Happens Now?
The women's latest statement before the Child Welfare Committee significantly changes the understanding of the case.
If the ceremony was staged solely for social media content, the legal questions surrounding the validity of the alleged marriage may no longer arise in the same way. However, authorities have not announced whether any further action will be taken regarding the creation and circulation of the viral videos.
The case has now shifted from a debate over an alleged marriage involving one groom and three women to a broader conversation about how content created for social media can quickly be mistaken for real events and spread widely online.
ALSO READ: Jharkhand Dalit Student Assault Case: What Happened Inside The Hostel?
TL;DR | News At A Glance
What changed?
The three women have now told the Child Welfare Committee that they never married the man featured in the viral videos.
Why did they make the videos?
They reportedly said the videos were staged to gain Instagram followers and social media popularity.
What had they claimed earlier?
They had earlier insisted the marriage was genuine and said they voluntarily married the same man so they could continue living together.
Does this contradict their earlier statements?
Yes. Their latest statement before the Child Welfare Committee contradicts the version they had previously shared in public videos.
What does this mean?
The development suggests that one of India's most viral stories may have been staged social media content rather than an actual wedding, though authorities have not yet announced whether any further action will follow.
