For a woman walking home at 10 or 11pm, safety should not depend on how crowded a road is, whether a police van happens to pass by or whether a CCTV camera is actually being monitored.
That concern was at the centre of a Supreme Court hearing on 5 October, as the court examined recent sexual offences reported in Delhi-NCR and questioned whether existing policing systems are doing enough to prevent such crimes.
The court said the focus cannot simply be on arresting an accused after an offence. The bigger task, it said, is to stop the crime from happening in the first place.
ALSO READ: 17-Year-Old Allegedly Gang-Raped By Three Men Posing As Cops In Delhi Park Near Kalkaji Temple
What Did The Supreme Court Say?
A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and K Vinod Chandran said women in Delhi should feel safe even while travelling by Metro or walking on the streets late at night.
Justice Pardiwala told the Delhi Police that it needed to create a strong sense of deterrence among people who may be inclined to commit sexual offences.
The court stressed that simply catching an accused after a crime is not enough.
“What is important is to prevent the crime, not what you do after the crime is committed,”
The court also asked police to identify vulnerable locations and strengthen surveillance, particularly around parks, railway stations, subways, bus stops, Metro stations, schools and colleges.
ALSO READ: Kalkaji Gang-Rape Case: Who Are The Three Accused And What Police Have Found About Them?
Why Is The Supreme Court Looking Into This?
The proceedings began after a series of reports about alleged sexual offences in Delhi-NCR.
On 28 September, the Supreme Court took suo motu cognisance of the issue. It referred to the alleged gangrape of a 17-year-old girl at Aastha Kunj Park in South Delhi, an alleged gangrape and murder of a teenage girl in northwest Delhi, and the alleged sexual assault of a minor inside a moving sleeper bus travelling from Greater Noida towards Delhi.
In the sleeper bus case, the court noted that the vehicle travelled more than 47 km before reaching Delhi, raising questions about whether law enforcement mechanisms could have detected or stopped the alleged offence earlier.
The 28 September order said the incidents pointed to concerns about the safety of public spaces and described inadequate lighting, poor surveillance and lax patrolling as potential administrative deficiencies that could facilitate crime.
The court then appointed Senior Advocate Liz Mathew as amicus curiae to assist it in examining the issue.
ALSO READ: Kalkaji Gang Rape Survivor Tells Police What Happened Inside Aastha Kunj Park On Her Birthday
SC Questions CCTV System In Delhi
One of the key issues raised during the October 5 hearing was the role of CCTV cameras in preventing sexual crimes.
Questioning whether cameras can be effective without someone monitoring them in real time, Justice JB Pardiwala asked, “When we talk about surveillance through CCTV, tell us how far these CCTV cameras would be helpful if there is no continuous monitoring in different war rooms?”
The court asked whether Delhi has a system similar to a war room where CCTV feeds from vulnerable areas can be continuously monitored and police can respond quickly when needed.
It also sought information on the working status of CCTV cameras and lighting at vulnerable locations, including Aastha Kunj Park.
The focus, therefore, was not simply on installing CCTV cameras, but on ensuring that surveillance can lead to timely police intervention.
ALSO READ: Swaroop Nagar Gang Rape-Murder: Teen Went To Meet A Friend, Body Found In Field After Dogs Ate It
What Can Delhi Police Do To Prevent Sexual Crimes?
The Supreme Court’s concerns went beyond CCTV cameras and surveillance. The bench also questioned whether Delhi Police was doing enough to deter people who may be prone to committing sexual offences.
Justice JB Pardiwala said the police needed to create a sense of fear among potential offenders so that they think twice before committing a crime.
“You need to create a fright or fear in the mind of a man who is prone to commit offences,” he said, stressing that such deterrence was necessary to prevent sexual crimes.
The court also wanted authorities to identify vulnerable areas and address gaps that could facilitate offences.
“The only concern is the deficiency, if any, should not facilitate the commission of a crime,” Justice Pardiwala said.
The court referred to complaints about alleged anti-social elements around Aastha Kunj Park and questioned whether such warnings had been acted upon before the alleged assault.
Senior Advocate Liz Mathew, who is assisting the court as amicus curiae, also pointed to gaps in the implementation of beat patrolling schemes. She highlighted a 39% vacancy in the beat patrolling unit.
For the court, the larger issue was whether women could actually feel safe using public spaces after dark.
Justice Pardiwala said the authorities must work together to ensure that “every young girl in the NCT of Delhi” feels safe even at 10 or 11 o’clock at night, whether she is travelling by Metro or walking on the streets.
The observation puts the focus on what happens before a crime takes place, including policing vulnerable areas, responding to local complaints and ensuring that existing safety measures work on the ground.
ALSO READ: 16-Year-Old Allegedly Gang-Raped On Sleeper Bus From Greater Noida To Delhi: What Happened?
The Bigger Question Is Women’s Safety
The Supreme Court’s remarks come nearly 14 years after the 2012 Nirbhaya case, which led to major changes in India’s laws on sexual offences. Yet, recent cases in Delhi have once again raised questions about whether women can safely use public spaces.
The court’s ongoing proceedings follow the alleged gang rape of a 17-year-old at Aastha Kunj Park, the alleged gang rape and murder of a teenage girl in northwest Delhi, and the alleged sexual assault of a minor inside a moving sleeper bus that travelled more than 47 km before reaching Delhi.
The concern is not just about what happens after a crime. It is also about whether vulnerable areas are properly lit, patrolled and monitored, and whether warnings about safety risks are acted upon.
The Supreme Court’s 28 September order had already linked women’s right to live with dignity and without fear of violence to Article 21. The latest hearing has now put greater emphasis on prevention and deterrence.
From Nirbhaya to the cases before the court today, the bigger question remains: have Delhi’s safety measures actually made women feel safer in public spaces?
The court is expected to issue detailed directions, with the matter scheduled for further hearing in November.
ALSO WATCH: Rapes In India, Seven Years After Nirbhaya
TL;DR | News At a Glance
What did the Supreme Court say about women’s safety in Delhi?
The Supreme Court said women in Delhi must feel safe walking alone or travelling at night and stressed the need to prevent sexual offences.
Why is the Supreme Court concerned about women’s safety in Delhi?
The court is hearing a suo motu case following reports of alleged rape, gangrape and sexual offences against minors in Delhi-NCR.
What has the Supreme Court asked Delhi Police to do?
The court asked Delhi Police to strengthen patrolling, surveillance and security in vulnerable areas, including parks, Metro stations, bus stops and subways.
What did the Supreme Court say about CCTV cameras?
The court questioned the effectiveness of CCTV cameras without 24-hour monitoring and a system for quick police intervention.
What is the Supreme Court examining in the Delhi women’s safety case?
The court is examining whether policing, CCTV surveillance, street lighting and beat patrolling are sufficient to prevent sexual crimes and improve women’s safety in Delhi.
What is the larger issue behind the Supreme Court hearing?
The case raises a broader question about whether women can safely use Delhi’s streets, public transport and other public spaces, especially at night.
ALSO READ: Nirbhaya Memories Revived After 30-Year-Old Woman Was Pulled Into Bus And Gang-Raped
